Happy Tuesday - thanks for spending part of your day with NILnomics. We’re continuing the series of conference tax return data (you can read Part One and Part Two).

The financial story of college athletic conferences is typically narrated through the lens of revenue — specifically, through the size and growth of television rights agreements, because those agreements produce the member distributions that dominate conference expense statements and determine the financial attractiveness of conference membership.

That narrative is not wrong, but it is incomplete in a way that the balance sheet data on IRS Form 990 makes visible. Conferences are not merely revenue distribution mechanisms; they are also capital accumulators, and the accumulation of financial reserves over the past decade has created a second, underreported dimension of conference financial power that operates independently of any particular media rights agreement. This issue examines that dimension.

Is there any interest out there in having a NILnomics Fantasy College Football League? I am willing to run a league if so - shoot me a message if you’re interested.

If this sounds like fun to you - reply to this email and raise your hand.

Part X of IRS Form 990 presents a conference's balance sheet at the beginning and end of each fiscal year, including total assets, total liabilities, and net assets — the difference between the two, which represents the organization's accumulated financial surplus. For conferences, which do not have shareholders and cannot distribute profits to owners, net assets function as a reserve fund: accumulated surpluses that provide a financial cushion against revenue shortfalls, fund capital investments, and, increasingly, generate their own investment returns.

The balance sheet data is less frequently analyzed than the income statement data, in part because it requires a longitudinal perspective to be meaningful — a single year's net asset figure tells you less than a decade's worth of changes in that figure, which reveals the rate of accumulation and the trajectory of financial strength. When you build that longitudinal picture from 990 filings across all major conferences, the story that emerges is one of diverging financial resilience: the Power Four conferences, and the SEC in particular, have accumulated reserves at a rate that has transformed their financial position from "well-funded operating organization" to something closer to "endowed institution."

Among Power Four conferences, the SEC's reserve fund trajectory stands apart in both scale and consistency. The conference has added meaningfully to its net asset position in nearly every year of the 2012–2023 window, building a financial cushion that by the early 2020s had reached a level — several hundred million dollars — that places it in a different category from its peers. The Big Ten has followed a similar trajectory at roughly comparable scale; the ACC and Big 12 have accumulated reserves at a slower rate, reflecting both lower total revenue and, in the case of the ACC, the extended financial obligations associated with the grant-of-rights agreement that has complicated the conference's membership dynamics.

The functional significance of a large reserve fund is not merely that it provides a buffer against revenue disruptions — though it does that. It is that a well-capitalized conference can make strategic decisions that a cash-constrained conference cannot. It can invest in content production infrastructure without waiting for a media rights renewal. It can absorb the legal costs of defending its governance model through extended litigation. It can offer enhanced distributions to prospective member schools to make joining financially attractive. And it can wait out a media negotiation long enough to extract more favorable terms, rather than accepting the first offer because it needs the revenue. The SEC's reserve fund is, in this sense, a form of institutional leverage that compounds over time.

If you’re interested in supporting this newsletter, the best thing you can do is 1) subscribe and 2) share it with a friend. Thank you for considering!

The investment income data, which flows through the revenue section of the 990, makes this dynamic even clearer. A conference with $400 million in net assets, invested in a diversified portfolio, generates tens of millions of dollars per year in investment income — revenue that is entirely independent of television negotiations, bowl games, or member school performance. Over a decade, the accumulation of that investment income creates a compounding financial advantage that the raw media rights revenue figures alone do not capture.

One of the most useful metrics in nonprofit financial analysis is "months of operating reserve" — the ratio of liquid net assets to average monthly operating expenses, which measures how long an organization could sustain operations if revenue stopped entirely. It is a metric designed for situations where the survival of the organization is genuinely at stake, which makes it seem like an unusual lens for analyzing college athletic conferences. But applied to the G5 landscape, it turns out to be more relevant than it might initially appear.

The Mountain West and Sun Belt conferences, in particular, have been operating with relatively thin reserve cushions relative to their annual expense bases, which means that a significant revenue disruption — the loss of a major member, a failed media renegotiation, an unexpected legal liability — would create an immediate operational crisis rather than a manageable drawdown from accumulated reserves. Several G6 conferences, however, carry more months of operating reserve than their Power Four counterparts — not because they have more wealth, but because they have built larger cushions relative to the smaller amounts they spend and distribute each year.

This makes the chart that follows worth reading carefully. Months of operating reserve quantifies resilience against disruption, not raw financial power, and those two things are not the same. The 990 balance sheet data allows us to quantify the former precisely, and the picture it reveals is considerably more complicated than a simple Power Four versus G5 hierarchy would suggest.

The SEC's bar will surprise readers who expect the richest conference in college sports to also be the most financially cushioned. It is not — at least not by this measure. The SEC carries approximately 1.3 months of operating reserve, placing it near the bottom of the Power Four on this metric, and the reason is straightforward once you understand what the calculation is actually measuring.

Months of operating reserve is net assets divided by average monthly expenses. The SEC's net assets — roughly $117 million in its most recent filing — are not small in absolute terms, but they are modest relative to the conference's total annual expenses of approximately $1.1 billion, nearly all of which represents distributions flowing out to fourteen member schools every year. When you divide $117 million by a monthly burn rate of over $93 million, the result is just over five weeks of reserve.

This is not financial fragility. It is a deliberate operational model. The SEC passes through almost everything it takes in, keeping minimal cash on hand because it does not need a buffer when media rights checks arrive with the regularity and scale that they currently do. The months-of-reserve metric measures resilience against disruption, not raw financial power, and by that measure the SEC is intentionally running lean — a rational choice when your revenue base is locked in by a multi-billion-dollar media agreement extending through the end of the decade.

The more instructive comparison is not SEC versus G5, but SEC versus what the SEC's own reserve position would look like if that media agreement were suddenly renegotiated at a fraction of its current value. Under that scenario, a conference distributing over a billion dollars a year with five weeks of reserve would face a materially different set of choices than one that had spent years building a larger cushion. The war chest, in other words, is only as durable as the television contract that funds it.

NILnomics has a partnership with NILNewsstand, a leading platform covering Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) and the revenue-sharing era of college athletics. As part of the agreement, NILNewsstand has launched the “NILNewsstand Data Series (Powered by NILnomics)”, a recurring content initiative available within NILNewsstand Pro, the platform’s professional membership offering.

The series is designed to deliver data-driven analysis, custom visuals, and practical insights to help athletic departments, operators, and industry professionals better understand and navigate the evolving NIL and revenue-sharing landscape.

Unlike traditional coverage, the NILNewsstand Data Series is built specifically for professionals working inside college athletics.

“Our goal has always been to inform the people actually building and operating in this space,” said Kyle Ems, Founder of NILNewsstand. “This partnership allows us to add a structured, data-driven layer to our coverage — not just what’s happening, but what it means and what to do next.”

The latest issue breaks down the latest Opendorse Annual Report. Find the full article and all others in the series here..

No event in recent memory tested conference reserve funds more directly than the 2020–2021 pandemic year, when fall sports were either canceled or played in reduced-capacity environments that dramatically curtailed game-day revenue and, in some cases, triggered force majeure clauses in media agreements that reduced rights fee payments. The balance sheet data for that fiscal year provides a natural experiment in financial resilience: conferences with substantial reserves were able to maintain member distributions at near-normal levels by drawing on accumulated net assets, while conferences with thin reserve positions were forced to reduce distributions or defer payments entirely.

The 990 filings from fiscal year 2020 and 2021 show this divergence with unusual clarity: Power Four conferences with strong reserve positions drew down their net assets modestly and recovered within one to two fiscal years, while some G5 conferences showed more significant balance sheet stress that persisted into 2022. The pandemic year is, in this sense, not just a data anomaly to be flagged and discarded — it is an empirical test of the financial models that conferences have built, and the results of that test reinforce the broader argument this series has been making about the structural divergence between resource-rich and resource-constrained conferences.

Thanks to you and the other 1,468 subscribers who get this newsletter weekly. Please feel free to share it with anyone that would enjoy it - here, on LinkedIn, or elsewhere. You can find me on LinkedIn or X if you want my latest thoughts.

Best,

Greg Chick, PhD
Data Analyst

NILnomics is a research and analytics platform covering the business of college sports. We build original data infrastructure — drawing on public filings, financial disclosures, and athletic department records across hundreds of institutions — to power in-depth reporting, interactive dashboards, and financial models. Our work helps administrators, agents, and industry leaders understand how athletic departments raise, spend, and report money. Founded by a data analyst with a PhD in NCAA financial policy, NILnomics pairs academic rigor with decision-ready analysis.